
The speed test that you can do on your ISP's server is often not reliable, because it always gives perfect scores on their own servers.Ģ. Now we probably all know (from Ookla), but I regularly hear that the values you get from them are very questionable and do not give a good idea of the real speed you get from your ISP. I did a speetest on on several different servers I am at 60 constant (apart from a few months or even a week ago I was at 120)ġ. iperf and mikrotik get very close to full speed. never gets more that 100Mbps international. Then you also have this topic for example: There are other topics that also report that there may be a difference between the two websites: Translation: For 3 months, I have been on fiber (see my signature), I have a symmetrical Orange 400Mb/s package (down and up) with Nperf, I always have around 400 in both directions and even sometimes a little more!, but with Speedtest I never exceeded 300, often even below 200! measurements taken at the same time! I even had very low values below 10 when it was wrong. Original French text: Depuis 3 mois, je suis fibré (voir ma signature), j'ai un forfait Orange 400Mb/s symétrique (en down et up ) avec Nperf, j'ai toujours autour de 400 dans les 2 sens et même des fois un peu plus!, mais avec Speedtest je n'ai jamais dépassé 300, souvent même en dessous de 200 ! mesures faites au mêmes instants ! j'ai même eu des valeurs très faibles inférieures a 10 alors que c'était faux. Ookla's Speedtest is less qualitative for me and the upload is often blocked for me. nPerf uses multiple simultaneous connections for its test. Translation: Our reference site is nPerf, and I advise to always use the same server (manual choice) Wingo in Switzerland 100Gbs. Speedtest d'Ookla est pour moi moins qualitatif et souvent l'upload est bloqué chez moi. nPerf utilise plusieurs connexions simultanées pour son test. Original French text: Notre site de référence est nPerf, et je conseille d'utiliser toujours le même serveur (choix manuel) Wingo en Suisse 100Gbs.
